ABC Solar CCL#914346 • Solar + Storage Since 2000
HOMEOWNER RIGHTS • HOA • PERMITS • EASEMENTS • BILLING

California Solar Rights Act (Practical Guide)

This page is a contractor-written overview of the key California laws that protect your right to install solar and storage, prevent unreasonable HOA restrictions, and require streamlined permitting. It also explains how billing rules evolved from traditional Net Energy Metering (NEM) to today’s Net Billing framework.

Important note (read this first)

We are not your attorney. This is educational information and practical “how-to” based on statutes and public agency guidance. For legal advice or litigation strategy, consult a qualified California attorney.

What we’re great at:

Designing and building code-compliant solar + storage systems, documenting technical compliance, and navigating plan check and inspection.

What the law is trying to do:

Remove unreasonable barriers to solar and standardize permitting so safe systems get approved quickly. Gov. Code §65850.5 is explicit about the statewide concern and administrative approval model.

1) HOA protections: Civil Code §714 (the “can’t unreasonably block solar” rule)

California Civil Code §714 is one of the backbone statutes commonly referred to as part of the Solar Rights Act. In plain English: an HOA can regulate how you install, but it generally cannot prohibit solar outright or use “aesthetics” as a disguised ban. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

What HOAs CAN do
  • Require an architectural review application and reasonable documentation.
  • Ask for placement choices that do not materially harm performance or cost.
  • Enforce legitimate safety rules that are actually grounded in code requirements.
What HOAs CANNOT do
  • Use CC&Rs to create “unreasonable restrictions” that functionally block installation. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
  • Try to force a permit denial by refusing HOA approval (cities can’t condition a solar permit on HOA approval). :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

Want deeper reading? California’s Office of Historic Preservation hosts a detailed Solar Rights Act review that summarizes the statute framework and historical context. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

2) Streamlined permitting: Gov. Code §65850.5 (plus modern “SolarAPP+” requirements)

Government Code §65850.5 requires cities/counties to use an administrative (non-discretionary) permit approval process for solar energy systems, limiting review to health-and-safety requirements—rather than subjective “discretionary” review. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

AB 2188 (small residential rooftop solar)

AB 2188 amended §65850.5 and pushed jurisdictions to adopt an expedited checklist-based process for small residential rooftop solar, including timely inspection expectations. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

SB 379 / Gov. Code §65850.52 (online automated permitting)

SB 379 requires jurisdictions to implement an online, automated permitting platform for qualifying residential solar (and certain paired storage) — often via SolarAPP+. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}

Permit fees: jurisdictions cannot base solar permit fees on the system’s valuation; fees must track the cost of issuing the permit (see Gov. Code §65850.55). :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}

Practical plan-check tip (what we do):

We respond to corrections with a clean “compliance packet”: stamped plans, cut sheets, structural attachment details, fire access layout (where applicable), labeling schedule, and a one-page narrative mapping corrections to the exact sheet and code reference. When the reviewer sees “health & safety / code compliance” clearly documented, approvals move faster.

3) Solar easements: Civil Code §801 / §801.5 (sunlight access by agreement)

California recognizes a “solar easement” as the right of receiving sunlight across a neighbor’s property for a solar energy system. This is primarily an agreement you negotiate and record—useful when long-term shading risk is a real concern. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}

Good for
  • Properties with close neighbors and future construction risk.
  • Long-lived systems where shading materially impacts payback.
  • When both owners want clarity (no surprises later).
Reality check
  • This is not “automatic.” It usually requires neighbor cooperation and proper recording.
  • It’s a legal instrument—talk to counsel if you want it done right.

4) NEM vs Net Billing: what homeowners should know in 2026

Traditional NEM is codified in Public Utilities Code §2827. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9} But for California’s investor-owned utilities, new interconnection applications since April 15, 2023 have generally taken service on the CPUC’s Net Billing Tariff (NBT) (also commonly called the “Solar Billing Plan”). :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}

What changed (plain English):

Exported energy credits are no longer “retail-like” for most new customers; the best economics now come from self-consumption — using solar directly, and using batteries to shift solar into evening peaks. That’s why storage has moved from “optional upgrade” to “core strategy.”

5) CPUC jurisdiction boundaries: PUC §1759 (why some fights don’t belong in trial court)

Public Utilities Code §1759 limits most courts from reviewing, reversing, or interfering with CPUC orders/decisions, reserving that kind of review to the Court of Appeal / Supreme Court channels in specific ways. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}

Practical impact: if a dispute is really “about” a CPUC decision (rates, tariffs, interconnection rules, NBT policy), you generally need to follow the CPUC pathway (or the specific appellate review route), not a local trial-court workaround.

6) Filing complaints & building a paper trail (what works)

When a city or HOA creates friction, the fastest path is often documentation + statutory citations + a clean technical compliance submittal. Below are practical templates we’ve seen succeed.

A. “Notice of Non-Compliance” (permit delay / discretionary review)
Subject: Notice of Solar Permitting Non-Compliance (Gov. Code §65850.5)

To: [Building Official / Community Development Director]
CC: [City Manager], [City Attorney] (optional)

Hello,

This letter provides notice that the current permitting approach for my solar energy system appears inconsistent with California Government Code §65850.5, which requires administrative (non-discretionary) approval and limits review to applicable health and safety requirements.

Please provide:
1) The specific code section(s) you contend are not met; and
2) A written correction list detailing all deficiencies required for approval.

I request that the permit be processed under the jurisdiction’s expedited/administrative solar permitting pathway consistent with §65850.5.

Sincerely,
[Name]
[Project Address]
[Phone / Email]
B. HOA “Solar Rights” letter (CC §714)
Subject: Request for Solar Architectural Approval (Civil Code §714)

To: [HOA Architectural Committee / Board]
Re: [Address / Lot]

Hello,

Please treat this as a formal request for approval to install a solar energy system. California Civil Code §714 limits HOA restrictions on solar installations and prohibits unreasonable restrictions that effectively prevent installation.

Attached: Site plan, array layout, product data sheets, and safety/code compliance documentation.

If the HOA proposes changes, please specify the exact written requirement and explain how it remains consistent with Civil Code §714.

Sincerely,
[Name]
[Address]
[Phone / Email]

7) Public Records Request (CPRA) template: make the process transparent

Under the California Public Records Act, an agency generally must determine within 10 days whether it has disclosable records responsive to your request, and may extend that determination by up to 14 additional days for defined “unusual circumstances.” :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}

Subject: Public Records Act Request – Solar Permitting Compliance Documents

To: [City Clerk / Custodian of Records], [City Name]
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code §7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of the following:

1) The City’s ordinances / administrative bulletins implementing expedited or administrative permitting for solar energy systems (including any checklists, standard plans, and public-facing guidance).
2) Any published “solar permit checklist” and the date it was last revised.
3) Fee schedule(s) for residential rooftop solar permits and the basis/method used to calculate those fees (for Gov. Code §65850.55 compliance).
4) Records reflecting how the City processes SolarAPP+ (if applicable), including any local intake steps.

Please provide records electronically if available.

Thank you,
[Name]
[Email]
[Phone]
[Mailing Address]
Pro tip:

Ask for the “checklist, standard plan, fee basis, and internal routing steps.” Those four items usually reveal where a jurisdiction is (or isn’t) actually following streamlined solar rules.

Want ABC Solar to help?

If you’re dealing with HOA pushback, permit delays, or you want a storage-first design that beats TOU, call or email us. We’ll put the engineering and documentation in place so the system is safe, code-compliant, and approvable.